AccountID.cpp

#include <xrpl/protocol/AccountID.h>
 
#include <xrpl/basics/hardened_hash.h>
#include <xrpl/basics/spinlock.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/Zero.h>
#include <xrpl/beast/utility/instrumentation.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/PublicKey.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/digest.h>
#include <xrpl/protocol/tokens.h>
 
#include <atomic>
#include <cstdint>
#include <cstring>
#include <memory>
#include <mutex>
#include <optional>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
 
namespace xrpl {
 
namespace detail {

class AccountIdCache
{
private:
    struct CachedAccountID
    {
        AccountID id;
        char encoding[40] = {0};
    };
 
    // The actual cache
    std::vector<CachedAccountID> cache_;
 
    // We use a hash function designed to resist algorithmic complexity attacks
    HardenedHash<> hasher_;
 
    // 64 spinlocks, packed into a single 64-bit value
    std::atomic<std::uint64_t> locks_ = 0;
 
public:
    AccountIdCache(std::size_t count) : cache_(count)
    {
        // This is non-binding, but we try to avoid wasting memory that
        // is caused by overallocation.
        cache_.shrink_to_fit();
    }
 
    std::string
    toBase58(AccountID const& id)
    {
        auto const index = hasher_(id) % cache_.size();
 
        PackedSpinlock sl(locks_, index % 64);
 
        {
            std::scoped_lock const lock(sl);
 
            // The check against the first character of the encoding ensures
            // that we don't mishandle the case of the all-zero account:
            if (cache_[index].encoding[0] != 0 && cache_[index].id == id)
                return cache_[index].encoding;
        }
 
        auto ret = encodeBase58Token(TokenType::AccountID, id.data(), id.size());
 
        XRPL_ASSERT(ret.size() <= 38, "xrpl::detail::AccountIdCache : maximum result size");
 
        {
            std::scoped_lock const lock(sl);
            cache_[index].id = id;
            std::strcpy(cache_[index].encoding, ret.c_str());
        }
 
        return ret;
    }
};
 
}  // namespace detail
 
static std::unique_ptr<detail::AccountIdCache> gAccountIdCache;
 
void
initAccountIdCache(std::size_t count)
{
    if (!gAccountIdCache && count != 0)
        gAccountIdCache = std::make_unique<detail::AccountIdCache>(count);
}
 
std::string
toBase58(AccountID const& v)
{
    if (gAccountIdCache)
        return gAccountIdCache->toBase58(v);
 
    return encodeBase58Token(TokenType::AccountID, v.data(), v.size());
}
 
template <>
std::optional<AccountID>
parseBase58(std::string const& s)
{
    auto const result = decodeBase58Token(s, TokenType::AccountID);
    if (result.size() != AccountID::kBytes)
        return std::nullopt;
    return AccountID::fromRaw(result);
}
 
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/*
    Calculation of the Account ID
 
    The AccountID is a 160-bit identifier that uniquely
    distinguishes an account. The account may or may not
    exist in the ledger. Even for accounts that are not in
    the ledger, cryptographic operations may be performed
    which affect the ledger. For example, designating an
    account not in the ledger as a regular key for an
    account that is in the ledger.
 
    Why did we use half of SHA512 for most things but then
    SHA256 followed by RIPEMD160 for account IDs? Why didn't
    we do SHA512 half then RIPEMD160? Or even SHA512 then RIPEMD160?
    For that matter why RIPEMD160 at all why not just SHA512 and keep
    only 160 bits?
 
    Answer (David Schwartz):
 
        The short answer is that we kept Bitcoin's behavior.
        The longer answer was that:
            1) Using a single hash could leave ripple
               vulnerable to length extension attacks.
            2) Only RIPEMD160 is generally considered safe at 160 bits.
 
        Any of those schemes would have been acceptable. However,
        the one chosen avoids any need to defend the scheme chosen.
        (Against any criticism other than unnecessary complexity.)
 
        "The historical reason was that in the very early days,
        we wanted to give people as few ways to argue that we were
        less secure than Bitcoin. So where there was no good reason
        to change something, it was not changed."
*/
AccountID
calcAccountID(PublicKey const& pk)
{
    static_assert(AccountID::kBytes == sizeof(RipeshaHasher::result_type));
 
    RipeshaHasher rsh;
    rsh(pk.data(), pk.size());
    return AccountID::fromRaw(static_cast<RipeshaHasher::result_type>(rsh));
}
 
AccountID const&
xrpAccount()
{
    static AccountID const kAccount(beast::kZero);
    return kAccount;
}
 
AccountID const&
noAccount()
{
    static AccountID const kAccount(1);
    return kAccount;
}
 
bool
toIssuer(AccountID& issuer, std::string const& s)
{
    if (issuer.parseHex(s))
        return true;
    auto const account = parseBase58<AccountID>(s);
    if (!account)
        return false;
    issuer = *account;
    return true;
}
 
}  // namespace xrpl